What are the differences and similarities between India and America when it comes to racism?

Assuming America means the US, in my experience, India and the US are depressingly similar when it comes to racism. Both have a long shameful history of deliberately disenfranchising specific groups of people, who are then socially shunned, economically decimated, and culturally sidelined, of course after the dominant groups appropriate whatever they like or want. As well, this history is much longer in India, the group in question the Dalit, formerly called Untouchables. In the US, it's blacks and Native Americans. Process is also depressingly similar, the marginalized are deliberately segregated geographically, economically, educationally. In both countries, widespread protest movements galvanized change with governments enacting laws attempting to empower and enfranchise, through a variety of Affirmative action programs. However, ensuing changes are often cosmetic and cultures stubbornly hold on to the disenfranchising status quo. After all, easier for the privileged to view their accomplishments as merit-based rather than feasting off the banquet of generational entitlement, easier to dismiss the deliberately, systematically downtrodden groups as deserving of their lowlier fates. Difference is India retains a more visible and persistent feudal structure that exacerbates caste and class divides.

My earliest memory of bigotry is from my own family. With India still stubbornly feudal, everyone worth their salt has servants, now euphemistically called domestic workers. Change in name, not dignity. We had a couple, wife for house work, husband the gardener. I was around 3 or 4 years old. Living with us, my widowed paternal grandmother, conservative, rigid and very casteist. She'd wash her own clothes and hang them out to dry in the back yard. That day, as she used her long bamboo stick to hang it out on the back yard clothes line, Katayan, the gardener, accidentally brushed against her washed saree while weeding a garden patch. I'll never forget the Tamil cry that burst out from her lips, 'Dushta, dushta', i.e. wicked, wicked. Striking him once on the shoulder with her stick, she then agitatedly set to pulling her saree off the clothesline and ran off with it to wash it again, his body's accidental brushing apparently enough to 'pollute' it.

Of course, this was decades back and India has come a long way from such decrepit and utterly repulsive ideas or so the elite would have us believe but nothing could be further from the truth. By many measurable metrics, access to education, literacy rates, per capita income, Dalits remain marginalized and disenfranchised, entirely by design and not by accident. Sure, the Indian media often touts tremendous individual Dalit success stories but the reality is similar to the US. After all, one Obama in the White House doesn't mean blacks are suddenly equal to whites in terms of access to opportunities, wealth and power, and protection under the law, does it? And, lacking even the fig leaf of an Obama, Native Americans are left out of the conversation altogether.

Years later, a conference room at the US NIH fills up as people stream in for a meeting or presentation. Walk in on the tail end of some desultory conversation about a topical news issue, obviously about blacks. Shockingly, a senior white researcher, a famous name in fact, says of course, it's well known that among blacks it's the stupid ones that got caught in the first place. I'd never heard of such a flagrantly odious and self-serving theory to explain black enslavement. To hear it at all was shocking, to hear it stated by someone so highly educated even more so. That it was said at all in that room only emphasizes how spaces deemed to represent power in US society continue to systematically exclude blacks. Of course, that room was filling up with white Americans and immigrants deemed deserving, no blacks.

My own experience of racism in the US was less overt, often expressed as persistent suspicion. For e.g., being asked for my ID when presenting a credit card at the check-out when those ahead of and behind me, all whites, weren't. Once is a quirk. Often? That's a pattern. Then there was that ominous entanglement with a white cop my very first year in the US. Having written about it elsewhere (1), the recent, steady drip-drip of news stories of blacks killed in police encounters underlines in no uncertain terms how lucky I was to not end up with the same ignominious fate, shot and killed during a police encounter.

Recently, India was roiled with the high-profile Suicide of Rohith Vemula, a Dalit scholar at the University of Hyderabad. Didn't make as much of a buzz on Quora. Inevitably, what I read  included commenters unabashedly engaging in character assassination of a young man who's no longer around to defend himself. After all, at a time when internet penetration is <30% in India, no surprise haves would dominate in their access to it. Meantime, protestors in India are rightfully calling it institutional murder. After all, Dalits who demand to be seen as peers are actually perceived as dangerous interlopers and treated as such, creating conditions not so different from those that provoked the recent protests at 2015 University of Missouri protests. Why did Rohith's suicide touch such a nerve? The poignance and eloquence of his suicide note (2). Even birth in penury to a laborer and a seamstress couldn't prevent his rare and marvelous writing talent from blossoming. As James Baldwin famously seared the American public's conscience in his 1963 interview (3) with Dr. Kenneth Clark on the Negro and the American Promise, so Rohith's forlorn words reverberate in India today, in a culture that pays lip-service and doesn't sincerely engage in righting egregious historical wrongs, whose entrenched elite lack the generosity and humanism necessary to restore dignity to the ranks of the generationally oppressed by reaching out, mentoring and nurturing their talent. 

Racism is much more stark and overt for the thousands of African students now streaming into India for higher studies. As a black American PhD Student at the Delhi School of Economics wrote in 2009 (4),

'Discrimination in Delhi surpasses the denial of courtesy. I have been denied visas, apartments, entrance to discos, attentiveness, kindness and the benefit of doubt. Further, the lack of neighbourliness exceeds what locals describe as normal for a capital already known for its coldness.

My partner is white and I am black, facts of which the Indian public reminds us daily. Bank associates have denied me chai, while falling over to please my white friend. Mall shop attendants have denied me attentiveness, while mobbing my partner. Who knows what else is more quietly denied?

"An African has come," a guard announced over the intercom as I showed up. Whites are afforded the luxury of their own names, but this careful attention to my presence was not new. ATM guards stand and salute my white friend, while one guard actually asked me why I had come to the bank machine as if I might have said that I was taking over his shift'.

Be it Caste Hindus in India or whites in the US, bigotry goes underground following laws ostensibly banning it. Enacting laws isn't the same as implementing them. Entrenched power doesn't give its hegemony away. It has to be wrested out of cold dead, usually male, hands. Meantime, institutionalized bigotry cleverly engages in tokenism to gain the cover of plausible deniability, something B. R. Ambedkar, Dalit architect of India's constitution foresaw (5). Obvious symbols of tokenism, when blacks and mixed race sporadically rotated through my NIH lab, systematic lack of structural support and thoughtful mentoring ensured their inevitable failure. Self-fulfilling prophecy in place, such tokenism also gestates the far more dangerous seed of resentment within the easily self-satisfied and less self-aware among the privileged, yes, the same ones quick to myopically complain about oppressive levels of political correctness in society.

A quote often attributed to Gandhi advises, 'First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you and then you win'. Yet the process isn't so conveniently linear, tying itself in the pretty bow tie of victory at the end. All too often, initial victories are pyrrhic and the persistently disenfranchised need to cycle back through the process. So, be it India or the US, we're cycling back to the 3rd stage. In both cultures, pressures from such an abhorrent and unsustainable form of institutionalized apartheid are now again coming to the boiling point. Maybe a course correction, maybe some more laws, some more tokenism, ending with marginally more power to the Dalits and blacks. Dare we ever hope for better than this?

Foot-notes

1. Power without accountability creates a desert where disdain blooms at the expense of humanism and dignity by Tirumalai Kamala on TK Talk  

2. Rohith Vemula's suicide letter published by the Times of India, Jan 19, 2016. Full text: Dalit scholar Rohith Vemula's suicide note - Times of India 

3. James Baldwin interviewed by Dr Kenneth Clark, 1963. WGBH American Experience
 . Bonus Video  

4. Outlook India, Diepiriye Kuku, June 29, 2009. 'India Is Racist, And Happy About It' 

5. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Interview by BBC Radio, 1955. Round Table India - Dr Ambedkar Remembers the Poona Pact in an Interview on the BBC 

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-differences-and-similarities-between-India-and-America-when-it-comes-to-racism/answer/Tirumalai-Kamala