Why are certain kinds of work
considered dignified and others not? Cerebral, dignified. Manual, not as
much. I see this in India and in the US as well. Is this ingrained in
the nature of work or in our need to stratify? The industrial age,
post-industrial age and free market, dominant metaphors that define
work. They say work stratification is necessary for optimal efficiency.
Is it? More importantly, is the process value neutral? Doesn't an
inevitable value judgment accompany work stratification? Hence the
age-old hierarchy that disdains certain work more than others. In all
types of work, similar process at play. Take science, for instance.
Typically, project leads design the research while technical staff do
the hands-on work. Paid and rewarded less, and recognized not at all,
unmistakably hands-on science work is deemed grunge work. To the
detriment of the scientific enterprise, scientists and science itself.
With essential meaning lost in the process, we end up building bodies of
knowledge that are mere chimera.
When work is stratified in hierarchical silos that prioritize efficiency, it leaches essential meaning out of it. How much meaning is lost to that soulless tyrant, efficiency? Can't be quantified and therein lies more absurdity. Efficiency reigns in a world where the quantifiable is synonymous with meaningful. That which can't be quantified? Rendered unimportant, even meaningless. A more grotesque disconnect my mind cannot conceive.
The essential we lose pertain to unquantifiable elements such as bonds of purpose and meaning with others at work, and with the work itself. Bonds not reducible to simple quantification. What ensues? An abundance of terms that reveal an absurdly unnatural relationship to work. The daily grind, the rat race, TGIF (Thank God It's Friday), Work-Life Balance.
Work-Life Balance. How that phrase grabs me by the throat and suffocates. It scares me. My work gives essential meaning to my life. Instead I'm supposed to regard it as a necessary evil that makes the rest of my life possible? A glib corporatist phrase, implicit in it the idea that meaning comes from life, not from work. After all, meaning comes from intimate relationships, and our intimates inhabit our life, not our work, it decrees. Only in a world where work equals a pay cheque does Work-Life Balance make sense. Is work only a pay cheque though? Should it be?
How about Nature? What is Work-Life Balance to Nature? If I could commune with a bird or a bee, would they speak of the need for Work-Life Balance in their lives? Rather isn't the phrase Work-Life Balance itself the clearest evidence of a debasing process that makes our work lives less meaningful? Where the irrepressible joy of discovery, of purpose in work?
Should we expect irrepressible joy and purpose from work? Let's flip that proposition. Isn't there much tedium in non-work life as well? So many chores are part of daily life. Our bodies. Brushing teeth, bathing, personal grooming, shitting. Our lives. Cooking, cleaning, running errands, raising children. Yet we don't begrudge their daily presence in our lives the way we are prodded to do about work, especially in the US. No Work-Life Balance equivalent there. Why? Simple. Such daily chores are still a holistic part of our life while we have organized work, that which we get paid for, in such a way that it isn't. Our mandatory daily life chores don't befuddle us the way much of the work we get paid for do. We don't seek an explanation for their presence in our lives but we have created work lives which need explaining, even to ourselves. And therein lies the rub.
We spend more and more of our life at work even as the cultural and economic powers-that-be exhort us that it's a means for doing other, presumably more important and/or meaningful things. Do contradiction of terms get any bigger than this? Shouldn't work be more than a means, even an end in itself? Isn't work, any and every work, entitled to its own dignity?
https://tirumalaikamala.quora.com/Dignity-is-in-work-not-in-the-nature-of-the-work
When work is stratified in hierarchical silos that prioritize efficiency, it leaches essential meaning out of it. How much meaning is lost to that soulless tyrant, efficiency? Can't be quantified and therein lies more absurdity. Efficiency reigns in a world where the quantifiable is synonymous with meaningful. That which can't be quantified? Rendered unimportant, even meaningless. A more grotesque disconnect my mind cannot conceive.
The essential we lose pertain to unquantifiable elements such as bonds of purpose and meaning with others at work, and with the work itself. Bonds not reducible to simple quantification. What ensues? An abundance of terms that reveal an absurdly unnatural relationship to work. The daily grind, the rat race, TGIF (Thank God It's Friday), Work-Life Balance.
Work-Life Balance. How that phrase grabs me by the throat and suffocates. It scares me. My work gives essential meaning to my life. Instead I'm supposed to regard it as a necessary evil that makes the rest of my life possible? A glib corporatist phrase, implicit in it the idea that meaning comes from life, not from work. After all, meaning comes from intimate relationships, and our intimates inhabit our life, not our work, it decrees. Only in a world where work equals a pay cheque does Work-Life Balance make sense. Is work only a pay cheque though? Should it be?
How about Nature? What is Work-Life Balance to Nature? If I could commune with a bird or a bee, would they speak of the need for Work-Life Balance in their lives? Rather isn't the phrase Work-Life Balance itself the clearest evidence of a debasing process that makes our work lives less meaningful? Where the irrepressible joy of discovery, of purpose in work?
Should we expect irrepressible joy and purpose from work? Let's flip that proposition. Isn't there much tedium in non-work life as well? So many chores are part of daily life. Our bodies. Brushing teeth, bathing, personal grooming, shitting. Our lives. Cooking, cleaning, running errands, raising children. Yet we don't begrudge their daily presence in our lives the way we are prodded to do about work, especially in the US. No Work-Life Balance equivalent there. Why? Simple. Such daily chores are still a holistic part of our life while we have organized work, that which we get paid for, in such a way that it isn't. Our mandatory daily life chores don't befuddle us the way much of the work we get paid for do. We don't seek an explanation for their presence in our lives but we have created work lives which need explaining, even to ourselves. And therein lies the rub.
We spend more and more of our life at work even as the cultural and economic powers-that-be exhort us that it's a means for doing other, presumably more important and/or meaningful things. Do contradiction of terms get any bigger than this? Shouldn't work be more than a means, even an end in itself? Isn't work, any and every work, entitled to its own dignity?
https://tirumalaikamala.quora.com/Dignity-is-in-work-not-in-the-nature-of-the-work